• Users Online: 374
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 11-19

Deep inside the ceramic texture: A microscopic–chemical approach to the phase transition via partial-sintering processes in ancient ceramic matrices


1 Faculty of Conservation and Archaeology, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran; Department of Building Material Chemistry, University Siegen, Siegen, Germany
2 Department of Building Material Chemistry, University Siegen, Siegen, Germany

Date of Web Publication6-Feb-2018

Correspondence Address:
Mohammadamin Emami
Faculty of Conservation and Archaeology, Art University of Isfahan, Hakim Nezami St., P.O. Box 1744, Isfahan

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.1016/j.jmau.2015.08.003

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


High-resolution microscopy investigations on ancient ceramics recommend the complex progression of crystalline phases in an antique object via the sintering process. Based on materials-science point of view, sintering is not a routinely reaction in all crystalline phases with the same crystallographic pattern, but also is a transition pathway. Sintering depends on the processing of raw materials via the manufacturing process. Five samples are chosen for this analytical approach from two different periods from Tappeh Zaghe, Iran (5100 millennium BC). A multimicroscopical approach was carried out by means of polarized light microscopy, environmental scanning electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Crystalline phases were determined by X-ray diffraction and refined after Rietveld method. The observation of the behavior of phase–interphase boundaries of a crystalline part in the nano area suggests that the partial sintering is the point at which the mineral began to be decomposed, and the conditions of the occurrences of this phenomenon depend on crystallographic properties.

Keywords: Atomic force microscopy, Crystal chemistry, Environmental scanning electron microscopy, Mineralogy, Partial sintering


How to cite this article:
Emami M, Sakali Y, Pritzel C, Trettin R. Deep inside the ceramic texture: A microscopic–chemical approach to the phase transition via partial-sintering processes in ancient ceramic matrices. J Microsc Ultrastruct 2016;4:11-9

How to cite this URL:
Emami M, Sakali Y, Pritzel C, Trettin R. Deep inside the ceramic texture: A microscopic–chemical approach to the phase transition via partial-sintering processes in ancient ceramic matrices. J Microsc Ultrastruct [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 6];4:11-9. Available from: http://www.jmau.org/text.asp?2016/4/1/11/224844




  1. Introduction Top


The ceramic-manufacturing process is one that is achieved by a high-temperature operation. Indeed, after a well-given temperature called the sinter temperature, the originally clayey body and additives decompose to a sintered body. Many ancient ceramic materials are often defined as earthenware materials based on their raw-material usage (red earthenware clay, calcareous, or siliceous) and manufacturing temperature (950–1050 °C) [1]. For dispersion-strengthened ceramics, the particles have normally smaller diameters, ca. 0.01–0.1 μm (10–100 nm). The particle–matrix interaction, which is also responsible for strengthening, occurs at the atomic or molecular level of their constituents. The mechanism of strengthening is similar to that for hardening with respect to recrystallization as well as crystal deformation [2]. Whereas the matrix surrounds the major fraction of an applied load, the small additives hinder the motion of dislocations, and therefore, plastic deformation is restricted due to the tensile strengths [3],[4],[5]. Accordingly, sintering and phase decomposition in an inhomogeneous ceramic matrix through firing have a significant use for determining the manufacturing process in ancient ceramics and, furthermore, the quality of objects in the past. Generally, sintering is defined as a process that took place via phase transition, and makes most bulk ceramic components compact. An important phase transformation involves crystallization of high-temperature phases between 900 and 1050 °C in ancient ceramic matrices (or earthenware) [6]. Due to the recrystallization process, the body of the ceramic tends to become more stable. The initial deformation through the phase–interphase area is important for early hardening in the structure [7]. The deformation proceeds by increasing the temperature until the structure is totally decomposed. Therefore, one can assume that we will see the last stage of deformation through microscopic observation. Sinter temperature is the temperature by means of which the grain boundaries have to be damaged in order to build a smelt or new recrystallization [3]. According to the thermodynamic properties of the material, by passing the stability area of a solid phase to the sintered phase, the ceramic matrix becomes more unstable because of changing the viscosity in the phase–interphase area, as well as increasing the surface enthalpy [1]. For this purpose, the ceramic pieces from 5000 BC from Tappeh Zaghe in Iran have been chosen for the analysis. The primary studies on the characterization of the samples were carried out in 2013 [8]. The archeological context is proved based on archeological documentation and indexing [9],[10],[11]. The aim of this study was to confirm and characterize the recrystallization process through partial sintering with respect to lattice diffusion in the mineral structure. The investigated ceramics are proved to have a black core in their macroscopic and microscopic profiles. Black cores in ancient ceramics occurred via fragmental and incomplete firing, which helped to find the best preferred mineralogical-phase deformation [12]. Indeed, it is possible to obtain a qualitative characterization of nanostructures within intergranular deformation, which were induced by transformation polymorphic structure before sintering, through high-resolution-microscopy methods [13],[14].

This is a key point for the investigation of ancient potteries based on the observation of the exterior mineral boundaries for elucidating their sintering temperatures [15]. Using laser-scanning techniques, one can reconstruct the manufacturing strategy that was applied during the production maturity.


  2. Materials and methods Top


The samples are from early excavation at the ancient site of Tappeh Zaghe, which was carried out by Negahban in 1970 [16]. The samples have until now been kept in the treasury of the Archeological Department of the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. The observation on the surface of the objects suggests some information about the texture of the ceramic pieces. As mentioned before, the ceramics are excellent in their quality and unique objects with smooth surfaces in form, and, in many cases, these pieces proved to have a red decoration on the surface [Figure 1]. They contain just three textural characteristics for consideration: the matrix, which is mostly inhomogeneous and surrounds the other crystalline constituents; the additives, which are dispersed or scattered in the matrix as tiny crystals with different geometry and grain size; and finally, the pores [17]. The pores occur in two different ways: the first path is via sintering due to the shrinkage of the matrix, and the second path is after cooling due to the rate of cooling of a ceramic's matrix [3],[18]. The color of the body tends to be yellowish beige, and the core of the samples in some cases proved to be dark (or black) due to the uncompleted firing process [12],[19]. The dark color of the samples is not always based only on the incomplete firing, but also could occur with respect to the organic additives in the samples [20],[21],[22]. According to the very fine thickness of the objects, the investigated thin sections were prepared after gluing the surface of the objects on glass twice [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Investigated ceramic objects from the 5th millennium BC from Tappeh Zaghe with the typical red decoration on their surfaces.

Click here to view
Figure 2: Multiple image alignment (MIA) of the surface of a Zaghe type ceramic from the thin section. MIA technique allows well-defined structure of the whole surface via sticking together 360 pictures from the surface of the investigated object.

Click here to view


The analysis of the crystalline-phase composition after firing was carried out by X-ray diffraction, using equipment from X’Pert Pro (PANalytical). The mineral phases were quantified using a Rietveld-based quantification routine with the X’Pert HighScore Plus software from PANalytical, and crystal patterns were chosen based on the International Center for Diffraction Data powder-diffraction file from the find It program. A number of corrections of various parameters were implemented, including the geometry of the crystal, preferred orientation, asymmetry, crystallographic axes, and scale factor. Polarization microscopy has been carried out on the thin sections of ceramic slices (25 μm) with a BX51 Olympus instrument (inclusive analysis FIVE software). The minerals were identified by means of their typical birefringence, with a supplementary petrographical interpretation. Crystallization determination in the grain interface was investigated by means of an environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM; ESEM Quanta FEG 250 FEI with Apollo XL30 EDX) fitted with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer, accordingly. The sample was not embedded, and therefore, some instrumental failure was reduced. Microscopic investigation accomplished with measurements on the surfaces at suitable points using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) and piezo response-force-microscopy instrumentation from JEOUL with supplementary WSxM 6.3 software. The point analyses were first identified by reflected light microscopy.


  3. Results Top


3.1. Observation through polarized light microscope

The microscopic observation in all studied ceramics proved a layering structure based on their fragmented firing [19]. The most well-defined crystalline phases in the ceramics are observed on the external layer of the ceramics, and it seems that the external part had irregular firing or postponed heat transfer, in contrast to the matrix of the objects. The matrix of the body proved to have a regular sintered structure [Figure 3]A. Consequently, the outer layer of the pieces is not complimentarily sintered [23]. The mineral constituents within the outer layer are mostly well able to be interpreted. They consist of calcite, quartz, feldspars, plagioclase, and granitic rock fragments. Calcite was observed with its typical optical characteristic, and it seems that this layer has covered the ceramic body as slip. Calites have been detected through high birefringence and good occurrences of cleavage in their texture [Figure 3]B. Calcites are the best phases for studying partial sintering, because they show the heat treatment that is needed for decomposition of calcite to calcium oxide by ca. 800 °C [24]. Quartz is normally observed based on its high birefringence and undulatory extinction effect. The matrix of this layer is clayey and, due to the high porosity, seems to be less compacted [Figure 3]C. Plagioclases are interpreted based on their polysynthetic twinning after Carlsbad role [25] [Figure 3]D. Most high-temperature phases, as well as pyro-technological new crystallizations, are observed in the core of the ceramic objects [26], and will be interpreted via ESEM images.
Figure 3: (A) Sandwich structure of the ceramics. The slip and the core area are well observed. (B) Not well-decomposed calcite with high birefringence and corroded via heat transfer. (C) Clayey matrix within the quartz grains in the matrix. In some areas, igneous rock fragments are also visible. (D) Plagioclase defined as albite with typical Carlsbad twinning effect structure based on its igneous origin.

Click here to view


3.2. Crystalline-phase composition by X-ray diffraction

Selected diffractograms of ceramic samples illustrate all major crystalline phases based on their best preferred orientation in their powder pattern [Figure 4]. All of the minerals that are observed through the polarization microscope are also detectable due to the inorganic crystal-structure database powder-diffraction pattern. With respect to the thermodynamics of mineral occurrences, two groups of phases are observed; the first group is the low-temperature phases that were used as fillers or the minerals that were related to the raw materials (e.g., quartz, calcite, muscovite, and sanidine) [1],[27],[28]. The second group is the high-temperature phases that are produced via recrystallization and partial sintering (e.g., anorthite, diopside, gehlenite, and hematite) [29],[30],[31],[32].
Figure 4: One of the ceramic piece's diffractograms illustrating the crystalline phases in the matrix; otherwise, as filler. An = anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8); Cc = calcite (CaCO3); Di = diopside [CaMg(Si2O6)]; Geh = gehlenite [Ca2Al(AlSiO7)]; Hem = hematite (Fe2O3); Mus = muscovite, K{Al2[(OH)2/AlSi3O10]}; Qz = quartz (SiO2); Sa = sanidine (KNaAlSi3O8).

Click here to view


All of the crystalline phases are refined with respect to their crystallographic-pattern character. Profile fitting was applied to decompose the complicated powder pattern [33],[34]. A profile function is fitted to the observed intensities. The goal is to obtain better peak parameters, completely describing the measured scan. A 1 profile is characterized by three parameters: peak position, net intensity, and full width at half maximum [35]. Additional parameters are the 2/1 ratio and the background intensity. X’Pert HighScore utilizes the Pseudo–Voigt profile function, which is the weighted mean between a Lorentz and a Gauss function [36],[37]. The fitting process is carried out with a goodness of fit of about 3.2 and the best preferred orientations of phases that are mentioned in [Table 1].
Table 1: Calculated crystalline phases in the body of the ceramics with respect to their inorganic crystal-structure database pattern and their best preferred orientation.

Click here to view


A quantitative phase analysis can be performed on multiphase samples. The general scattering cross-section for Bragg scattering is proportional to N/V, where N is the number of unit cells contributing to the scattering and V is the unit cell volume [34]. The scale factor is then proportional to N/V.

As expected, the best present crystal is quartz with its very well-defined habit and structure in thin sections. Quartz is the foremost crystal that is observed in the external as well as internal layers of ceramics. Therefore, it appears with very sharp peaks and low full width at half maximum in a preferred orientation of about 2θ = 26°. Calcite, pyroxenes, gehlenite, and all possible secondary phases present with wide peaks that are randomly located above the background [1],[38]. Plagioclases are refined very inflexibly due to the high asymmetry in their crystal structure. Hematite and muscovite overlapped each other mostly due to the close occurrences of preferred orientations in the diffractogram. Hematite can occur in a low-scale factor, and therefore, can be also the secondary hematite after weathering of iron-rich clay in exposure to humidity or acidic drainage, which was leached out of the iron from the crystal structure of the clay [39].

3.3. Characterization of texture and phases by environmental scanning electron microscopy–EDX

The samples are investigated with respect to their contrast in phase constituents as well as their vitreous character in the core, which is characterized through its typical sinter structure [Figure 5]. The difference among elemental distributions was observed based on two point analyses (Areas 1 and2 in [Figure 5], which confirmed dominantly the enrichment of calcium in the external part (Area 2) in contrast to the core of the ceramic (Area 1).
Figure 5: Sinter structure in ceramic matrix. The structure is viscose iron-rich muscovite behind augite newcrystallization in the matrix. Iron has a role as flux in these samples for decreasing the sinter temperature.

Click here to view


Sinter structures are normally characterized by means of their viscose texture and bubbles that were produced from CO2 or SO3 evaporation [33] [Figure 6]A. Iron accumulations in the external layer of ceramics are present as a result of the coloring decoration on the surface due to the usage of red ochre in the ceramics. Normal sintering occurred in the entire grain boundaries [Figure 6]B. Normally, this kind of sinter structure is expected to form in a temperature range of >1200 °C, but in the ancient ceramics, it can also happen in a temperature range between 950 °C < T < 1050 °C [40],[41]. Ceramic firing usually has a firing (or sintering) path, which depends on the oxidation or reduction reaction as follows [31]:
Figure 6: (A) Ceramic internal structure with noncontinuous sinter structure in the core as well as well-sintered decorative layer on the surface; (B) deformation of grain boundaries due to the noncontinuous sintering; (C) sheet silicate like muscovite within the typically porous structure in the body of ceramic; and (D) illite crystals, which have not been decomposed either during low firing temperature or rapid cooling processes.

Click here to view


Dehydration (~100 °C) → loss of organic matter (~400 °C) → dehydroxylation (~600 °C) → carbonate decomposition (~750 °C) → recrystallization (~900 °C) → partial sintering (~1000 °C) → sintering (~1050 °C)

Quartz grain is easier to find within the thin section because, mostly, this was used as a filler or as inorganic nonplastic mineralogical additives in different grain sizes [40]. Quartz, plagioclase (mainly albite), calcite, and muscovite with definite crystal planes (0 0 1, 1 1 0) are the remaining phases from the raw material, whereas the other phases present have been formed during firing. The new crystalline phases that are rebuilt within the structure are pyroxene-type phases, such as augite or diopside (as detected also through X-ray diffraction). Augite and diopside are the last stages for high-temperature new recrystallization in the ceramic texture [23]. According to their formation as well as transition from other primary phases, these phases are very useful for detecting the partial sintering around their grain boundaries. The typical microstructure of noncontinuous vitrification in high calcareous clays is illustrated in [Figure 6]C, while the core has an entirely different microstructure [42]. The microstructure consists of a noncontinuously vitrified surface and a high concentration of fine bloating pores. This kind of microstructure is typically produced by a low firing condition [43]. Sheet silicates, such as biotite or muscovite, show this transition effect from solid to liquid with clarity [6]. In a clayey matrix, this transition is also detectable due to its crystal-structure deformation by increasing heat [Figure 6]D.

3.4. AFM application in piezoresponse-force-microscopy mode for discovering the decomposition of grain boundaries through partial sintering

The main part of this study focused on the detection of deformations as well as any crystalline defects on the boundaries of constituent phases. With the application of atomic-force-microscopy methods in the nano-scale area, crystal deformations or defects around the external boundaries of the crystal structure can be illustrated [18]. Based on the recent works that have been carried out by Emamiet al. [44], some crystalline phases, such as sheet silicates and quartz, have been studied. With respect to their crystal structure, the important part of each crystal system of sheet silicate (mainly clay) is AlO6octahedron. AFM scanning imaging in noncontact mode proved that the deformation of crystals began from the surfaces or layers perpendicular to the AlO6octahedron [Figure 7]. [Figure 7] shows three different scans from one similar area in different magnifications of approximately 200 nm, 100 nm, and 32 nm, respectively; the left picture is the scan of topography, and the right side is a cohesive picture of the scanned area [18]. The topography picture clearly shows the layering structure of sheet silicate, but in the cohesive picture, it is clear to show the different cohesiveness based on transition conditions on the solid structure. Based on these investigations, it is possible to obtain a model for crystallization as well as crystal alteration in the phase-interface area toward the crystallographic C axes. The direct transition and high velocity of reaction throughout [0 0 1] suggest that AlO6octahedron from the clay are being preserved during partial sintering [45]. Partial sintering happened for the first time by means of challenging along the viscosity changes between the plane, and was followed by a new crystallization phenomenon [18].
Figure 7: Surface characterization and partial smelting of the grain boundaries. This picture illustrates in situ atomic-force-microscope observations in RFM mode of sheet silicate with its plane structure in an average grain size from 200 nm to 32 nm, which shows the phase–interphase deformation due to the viscosity exchange in this crystal. The muscovite grain boundaries are not decomposed in a brittle manner, but elastic deformation is reported along theplane boundaries.

Click here to view



  4. Discussion Top


Sintering is a well-known term in ceramic science. Ceramic materials are objects that must be sintered to achieve better physicochemical properties, and are thermodynamically proved to be metastable. Sintering has mostly been investigated as a mechanism, not a result. Archeological earthenware objects are interesting objects that consist of different mineralogical-phase constituents with respect to the different sinter temperatures due to kiln construction in antiquity [46]. Indeed, ceramic technology is the oldest human tradition, but the newest scientific knowledge, and therefore, the investigation of old objects can suggest better interpretations for the characterization of technical ceramic-manufacturing processes nowadays. Sintering is not a process that quickly happened; rather, it took place via partial smelting of the grain boundaries in the matrix. According to this point of view, sintering and partial smelting of the matrix must be studied together [2],[30],[47]. Sintering is discussed here as the result, and partial smelting as the process. In many cases were suggested about the good firing and sintering, whereas the heat-transfer process was not carried out completely. According to the crystalline-phase compositions and their decomposition, it will be of interest to explain the state of the objects as being in the partial smelting zone or the smelting zone. Investigations regarding the partial smelting state are of considerable interest, because, in this state, the matrix is exposed to maximum mass diffusion through the crystalline-phase decomposition [46],[48],[49]. Different samples have been studied by means of their application for characterization of sintered texture. The samples are investigated via AFM in order to characterize the grain boundaries and their defects through sintering via partial smelting. All of the samples are from 5100 BC, and they seem to have optimal firing because of the solidity of their bodies. Archeological objects are preferred objects because they were made from well-processed soil and clay from their original regions, and, furthermore, their manufacturing techniques are actually primitive, and therefore, lead to a better visibility of texture. By contrast, partial smelting of clay minerals causes a better adherence of texture. In the earthenware materials, mostly 2–3% of clay minerals were found, which are classified as the secondary mineralization [7]. Partial sintering is also more detectable through AFM on the grain boundaries that were decomposed and rebuilt. Pseudocrystalline of SiO2is solved after 900 °C in small channels successively parallel to [0 0 1] plane. The external boundaries are changed by means of decreasing the volume and increasing the viscosity on the external surface of the crystal structures.


  5. Conclusions Top


This investigation suggests that Zaghe-type potteries have been made by a sophisticated process that included fine mantel layer on the surface and, at the same time, notably sinter structure in the body. Identification of the know-how for processing and usage of raw materials fasten together for identifying a complicated puzzle of >5100 years. High-resolution microscopic investigations of ancient objects suggest not only the useful interpretation about the development of textural features of an antique object, but also expand the material characterization strategy nowadays. A recent study provided a more complete appreciation of the technology 7100 years ago, and approve to characterization of a phenomenon called “partial sintering” based on high-resolution laser application in materials-science research combined with archeology.

Based on the mineralogical–chemical investigation, the potteries in Zaghe divided themselves in two separate groups, due to the raw-material usage. The first group is the Zaghe type, which has been made by a clayey (and calcareous) rich matrix. The grain size in the matrix is very fine and dense. The second group was proved to manufacture by iron-rich raw material. To characterize the partial sintering, high-resolution-microscopy methods (AFM and ESEM) were applied for determining the grain boundary behavior in the phase–interphase area with respect to the viscosity exchange through high-temperature practice. According to the investigations, partial sintering is a reaction that would be controlled by different mineralogical parameters. In ceramic matrix, the SiO2/Al2O3 + FeO indicates the assessment of reaction from solid to sol–gel phases during the sintering process. All these oxides present mainly in the solid phases (such asgehlenite, anorthite, K-feldspars, and muscovite).

By contrast, partial smelting of clay minerals causes better adherence of texture. The surfaces of the standard Zaghe ceramics (5100 BC) proved significant, continuously covering the mantel layer (or slip; ca. 1 mm) of nonfired silica-rich slush. The mantel layer does not confirm to be fired because of hydrated calcite and the remains of volcanic stone fragments, such as plagioclase, feldspars, and muscovite. Indeed, this layer could be identified as one of the oldest slips for pottery-decorating process. This layer disappeared from the 4900 by the appearance of Cheshmeh-Ali type.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the comments from Prof. Abdulmonem Al-Hayani, Prof. Salman Gurayatwo, and one anonymous reviewer for kindly reviewing this article and indicating important highlights to accomplish this paper, which are gratefully acknowledged; any residual errors are our own.



 
  References Top

1.
Emami SM, Trettin R. Phase generating processes in ancient ceramic matrices through microstructure investigation with high resolution microscopy methods. J Adv Micros Res 2010;5:181-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Grifa C, Cultrone G, Langella A, Mercurio M, De Bonis A, Sebastián E, et al. Ceramic replicas of archaeological artefacts in Benevento area (Italy): petrophysical changes induced by different proportions of clays and temper. Appl Clay Sci 2009;46:231-40.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Duminuco P, Messiga B, Riccardi M. Firing process of natural clays. Some microtextures and related phase compositions. Thermochim Acta 1998;321:185-90.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Freestone I, Middleton A. Mineralogical applications of the analytical SEM in archaeology. Mineral Mag 1987;51:21-31.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kilikoglou V, Vekinis G, Maniatis Y, Day P. Mechanical performance of quartz-tempered ceramics: part i, strength and toughness*. Archaeometry 1998;40:261-79.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Meyvel S, Palanivel R. Minerological characterization studies of archaeological pottery sherds using FT–IR and TG A-DTA. Recent Res Sci Technol 2009:1.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Grave P. Melting moments: modelling archaeological high temperature ceramic data. New directions in archaeological science. Terra Australis 2009;28:215-34.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Emami M,Trettin R. High Tech in 5100 BC: multianalytical approach for characterisation of decorated pottery from Tappeh-Zaghe. Surf Eng 2013;29:134-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Coningham R, Fazeli H, Young R, Donahue R. Location, location, location: a pilot survey of the Tehran Plain in 2003. Iran 2004:1-12.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Fazeli Nashli H, Beshkani A, Markosian A, Ilkani H, Abbasnegad Seresty R, Young R. The Neolithic to Chalcolithic transition in the Qazvin Plain, Iran: chronology and subsistence strategies. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan 2009;41:1-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fazeli N, Vidale M, Guida G, Coningham R. The evolution of ceramic manufacturing technology during the late Neolithic and transitional Chalcolithic periods at Tepe Pardis, Iran. Archaologische mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan 2010;42:87-112.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Noghani S, Emami M. Mineralogical phase transition on sandwichlike structure of clinky pottery from Parthian Period, Iran. Periodico di Mineralogia 2014:83.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Radha AV, Bomati-Miguel O, Ushakov SV, Navrotsky A, Tartaj P. Surface enthalpy, enthalpy of water adsorption, and phase stability in nanocrystalline monoclinic Zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc 2009;92:133-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Coble RL. Sintering crystalline solids. I. Intermediate and final state diffusion models.J Appl Phys 1961;32:787-92.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Coble RL. Sintering crystalline solids. II. Experimental test of diffusion models in powder compacts. J Appl Phys 1961;32:793-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Negahban EO. A Brief Report on the Painted Building of Zaghe (Late 7th–Early 6th Millennium BC). Maison René-Ginouvès; 1979.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Guarino V, De Bonis A, Grifa C, Langella A, Morra V, Pedroni L. Archaeometric study on terra sigillata from Cales (Italy). Periodico di Mineralogia 2011:80.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Emami SMA, Kowald T, Trettin R. Mineralogical and chemical investigation on the recrystallization process during sintering in phase-interface areas in ancient ceramic matrices. Mater Manuf Process 2009;24:934-41.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Szakmány G, Starnini E. Archaeometric research on the first pottery production in the Carpathian Basin: manufacturing traditions of the Early Neolithic, Körös Culture ceramics. Archeometriai Műhely 2007;2:5-21.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Marghussian AK, Fazeli H, Sarpoolaky H. Chemical–mineralogical analyses and microstructural studies of prehistoric pottery from Rahmatabad, South-West Iran*. Archaeometry 2009;51:733-47.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Maritan L, Nodari L, Mazzoli C, Milano A, Russo U. Influence of firing conditions on ceramic products: experimental study on clay rich in organic matter. Appl Clay Sci 2006;31:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Nodari L, Maritan L, Mazzoli C, Russo U. Sandwich structures in the Etruscan–Padan type pottery. Appl Clay Sci 2004;27:119-28.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
A role for ceramic materials science in art, history, and archaeology. Kingery WD, editor. MRS Proceedings. 1988.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Maniatis Y, Aloupi E, Stalios A. New evidence for the nature of the attic black gloss. Archaeometry 1993;35:23-34.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
QXRD, XRF and optical microscopy applied to characterization and provenance of ancient ceramics from Haft Teppeh (1500-1150 Bc), southwest Iran. Emami M, editor. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2012.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Maggetti M. Chemical analyses of ancient ceramics: what for? CHIMIA Int J Chem 2001;55:923-30.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Froh J. Archaeological ceramics studied by scanning electron microscopy. Hyperfine Interact 2004;154:159-76.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Letsch J, Noll W. Mineralogie und Technik der fruhen Keramiken Thessaliens. Neues Jahrbuch Mineralogische Abhandlungen 1983;147:109-46.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Di Maio G, Balassone G, Ferrow E, Barca D, Mormone A, Petti C, et al. Mineralogical and geochemical characterization of the concotto artefacts from firing places of Longola protohistoric settlement (Naples). Periodico di Mineralogia 2011;80:351.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Emami M, Trettin R. Mineralogical and chemical investigations on the ceramic technology in Čoġā Zanbil (Iran, 1250 BC). Periodico di Mineralogia 2012;81:3.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Rathossi C, Pontikes Y. Effect of firing temperature and atmosphere on ceramics made of NW Peloponnese clay sediments. Part I: Reaction paths, crystalline phases, microstructure and colour. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010;30:1841-51.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Rathossi C, Pontikes Y. Effect of firing temperature and atmosphere on ceramics made of NW Peloponnese clay sediments: Part II. Chemistry of pyrometamorphic minerals and comparison with ancient ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010;30: 1853-66.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Garrigos BI, Jones R, Kilikoglou V, Levi S, Maniatis Y, Mitchell J, et al. Technology transfer at the periphery of the mycenaean World: the cases of Mycenaean Pottery found in Central Macedonia (Greece) and the Plain of Sybaris (Italy)*. Archaeometry 2003;45: 263-84.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Rietveld H. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1969;2:65-71.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lemine O, Sajieddine M, Bououdim M, Msalam R, Mufti S, Alyamani A. Rietveld analysis and Mössbauer spectroscopy studies of nanocrystalline hematite a-Fe2O3. J Alloys Compd 2010;502:279-82.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Du W, Zhao C, Cai Y. Propagation of Lorentz and Lorentz–Gauss beams through an apertured fractional Fourier transform optical system. Optics Lasers Eng 2011;49:25-31.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Finger L, Cox D, Jephcoat A. A correction for powder diffraction peak asymmetry due to axial divergence. J Appl Crystallogr 1994;27:892-900.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Linnow K, Halsberghe L, Steiger M. Analysis of calcium acetate efflorescences formed on ceramic tiles in a museum environment. J Cult Herit 2007;8:44-52.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
De Bonis A, Grifa C, Cultrone G, De Vita P, Langella A, Morra V. Raw materials for archaeological pottery from the Campania Region of Italy: a petrophysical characterization. Geoarchaeology 2013;28:478-503.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Maniatis Y, Tite M. Technological examination of neolithic-bronze age pottery from central and southeast Europe and from the Near East. J Archaeol Sci 1981;8(1):59-76.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Tschegg C, Ntaflos T, Hein I. Thermally triggered two-stage reaction of carbonates and clay during ceramic firing—a case study on bronze age cypriot ceramics. Appl Clay Sci 2009;43:69-78.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Cultrone G, Rodriguez-Navarro C, Sebastian E, Cazalla O, De La Torre MJ. Carbonate and silicate phase reactions during ceramic firing. Eur J Mineral 2001;13:621-34.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Courty M-A, Roux V. Identification of wheel throwing on the basis of ceramic surface features and microfabrics. J Archaeol Sci 1995;22:17-50.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Emami SMA, Volkmar J, Trettin R. Quantitativ characterisation of damage mechanisms in ancient ceramics by quantitative X-ray powder diffraction, polarisation microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy and non-contact mode atomic force microscopy. Surf Eng 2008;24:129-37.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Li X, Xu Z-H, Wang R. In situ observation of nanograin rotation and deformation in nacre. Nano Lett 2006;6:2301-4.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Ionescu C, Hoeck V, Gruian C, Simon V. Insights into the EPR characteristics of heated carbonate-rich illitic clay Appl Clay Sci 2014;97-98:138-45.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Hoeck V, Ionescu C, Metzner-Nebelsick C, Nebelsick LD. Mineralogy of the ceramic slags from the Bronze Age funerary site at Lăpuş (NW Romania). Geol Q 2012;56:649-64.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Ionescu C, Hoeck V, Crandell ON, Šarić K. Burnishing versus smoothing in ceramic surface finishing: a SEM study. Archaeometry 2014, n/a-n/a.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
McCown DE. The Comparative Stratigraphy Of Early Iran. The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1942.  Back to cited text no. 49
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Research on ancient ceramic identification by artificial intelligence
Tianhong Mu,Fen Wang,Xiufeng Wang,Hongjie Luo
Ceramics International. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Composition, technology and provenance of Roman pottery from Napoca (Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
Ágnes Gál,Corina Ionescu,Mátyás Bajusz,Vlad A. Codrea,Volker Hoeck,Lucian Barbu-Tudoran,Viorica Simon,Marieta Mure?an-Pop,Zsolt Csók
Clay Minerals. 2018; 53(4): 621
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Study of the Ancient Crimean Ceramics by Electron Microscopy Methods
A. V. Mandrykina,D. N. Khmelenin,N. N. Kolobylina,A. L. Vasil’ev,T. N. Smekalova,N. F. Fedoseev,E. Yu. Tereschenko,O. A. Alekseeva,E. B. Yatsishina
Crystallography Reports. 2018; 63(5): 849
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and...
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed477    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded37    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal