• Users Online: 92
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 11-16

Prostatic carcinogenesis: More insights


1 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
2 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Date of Web Publication7-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Eman M Saied
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_11_18

Get Permissions

  Abstract 

Background: Prostatic carcinoma ranks as the second most common malignant tumor and the fifth cause of cancer-related deaths in men. Many studies now focus on the different molecules involved in prostatic carcinogenesis. Maspin and prohibitin (PHB) are suggested to play crucial roles in the development and progression of many cancers; however, their roles in prostatic carcinogenesis have not been fully elucidated. Aim: This work was designed to study the immunohistochemical expression of maspin and PHB in prostatic carcinoma in comparison to their expression in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to give more insights about their roles in prostatic carcinogenesis. Materials and Methods: Archival blocks of 30 cases of prostatic adenocarcinomas and 15 cases of BPH were subjected to histopathological examination and immunohistochemical evaluation of maspin and PHB expression. Results: Maspin showed higher expression in prostatic carcinoma (88.9% of cases) compared to BPH (20% of cases). PHB expression was detected only in prostatic carcinoma (84.4% of cases), while all cases of BPH were negative. The expression of both maspin and PHB showed statistically significant increase with increasing Gleason score (P = 0.0125 and 0.0065 respectively). Conclusions: Overexpression of maspin and PHB in prostatic carcinoma reflects their vital roles in prostatic carcinogenesis. Their upregulation with increasing Gleason score indicates their prognostic significance. Moreover, PHB may differentiate between prostatic carcinoma and BPH being expressed only by malignant cells.

Keywords: Gleason score, maspin, prognosis, prohibitin, prostatic carcinoma


How to cite this article:
Saied EM, Alshenawy HA. Prostatic carcinogenesis: More insights. J Microsc Ultrastruct 2018;6:11-6

How to cite this URL:
Saied EM, Alshenawy HA. Prostatic carcinogenesis: More insights. J Microsc Ultrastruct [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 16];6:11-6. Available from: http://www.jmau.org/text.asp?2018/6/1/11/231942


  Introduction Top


Prostatic carcinoma is a major health problem as it is considered the second most common malignancy among men and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide.[1],[2] It results from a combination of genetic and environmental factors that alter key cellular processes and involves multiple cellular pathways and molecules implicated in its initiation and progression, however, the specific underlying mechanisms of prostatic carcinogenesis are still unrevealed.[3],[4]

Maspin (mammary serine protease inhibitor) and prohibitin (PHB) are important key molecules involved in different cellular mechanisms related to carcinogenesis. Maspin is a member of the serine protease inhibitor/noninhibitor superfamily (serpin), located on chromosome 18q21.3–q23. Interestingly, it was described to be overexpressed in some cancers including pancreatic, gallbladder, colorectal, and thyroid cancers, while downregulated in other cancers including breast and gastric carcinomas as well as melanomas.[5],[6]

PHB is a high molecular weight protein located in the mitochondria, nucleus, and plasma membranes [7] and has been described to be involved in multiple processes controlling the development and growth of different organ cancers. Similar to maspin, PHB overexpression was described in some cancers involving the cervix, esophagus, stomach, breast, lung, bladder, thyroid, and ovary, while others such as gliomas showed downregulation.[8]

Aim of the work

This work was designed to study the immunohistochemical expression of maspin and PHB in prostatic carcinoma in comparison to their expression in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to give more insights about their roles in prostatic carcinogenesis.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study was carried out on paraffin blocks of formalin-fixed tissue sections of 45 prostatic specimens including 30 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma and 15 cases of BPH. These specimens were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, during the period from 2012 to 2015. None of the studied patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University.

Histopathological study

The histopathological diagnosis of the studied specimens was revised, and prostatic carcinoma cases were graded according to the Gleason grading system.[9] Gleason scores 2–4 were classified as well differentiated, 5–6 as moderately differentiated, and 7 or more as poorly differentiated prostatic carcinoma.[10]

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the UltraVision Detection Kit (TP-015-HD, Lab Vision, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. After deparaffinization and heat pretreatment, sections were incubated for 10 min with Ultra V block to prevent nonspecific background staining, followed by rinsing the sections with PBS. Afterward, an overnight incubation was done in a humidity chamber with, mouse monoclonal anti-maspin (E-10) antibody (clone sc-166260, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at a dilution 1:100, and mouse monoclonal anti-PHB (E-5) antibody (clone sc-377037, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at a dilution 1:100, followed by washing in PBS. Sections were then covered with 4–5 drops of UltraVision Biotinylated Goat Anti-Polyvalent secondary antibody, incubated at room temperature for 10 min, then washed in PBS, followed by incubation with streptavidin-peroxidase solution for 10 min at room temperature, then rinsing with PBS. Sections were then covered for 15 min by adding one drop of 3-3'-diamino-benzidine-tetra-hydrochloride (DAB) chromogen mixed with 2 ml of DAB substrate [Figure 1]. Finally, sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin, dehydrated in alcohol, and mounted in di-n-butyl-phthalate-polystyrene-xylene. As positive controls, sections from human tonsil (for maspin) and sections from human ovarian tissue (for PHB) were used. Negative controls were prepared by omission of the primary antibodies.
Figure 1: Immunohistochemical expression of maspin in: (a) BPH showing weak (+1) maspin expression restricted to the basal cells (Immunoperoxidase, ×200), (b) well-differentiated prostatic carcinoma showing weak (+1) maspin expression (Immunoperoxidase, ×400), (c) moderately differentiated prostatic carcinoma showing moderate (+2) maspin expression (Immunoperoxidase, ×400), and (d) poorly differentiated prostatic carcinoma showing strong (+3) maspin expression (Immunoperoxidase, ×400)

Click here to view


Evaluation of maspin and prohibitin immunohistochemical staining

Distinct granular cytoplasmic staining for maspin and cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining for PHB were considered to indicate positive immunoreactivity [Figure 2]. The immunohistochemical score (IHS) was used for maspin and PHB immunohistochemical evaluation by means of light microscopy by examination of 10 high-power fields (×400) in each slide, and the average IHS score was calculated by combining the quantity score (percentage of positive-stained cells) with the staining intensity score. The quantity score ranges from 0 to 4, that is, 0, no immunostaining; 1, 1%–10% of cells are stained; 2, 11%–50% are positive; 3, 51%–80% are positive; and 4, ≥81% of cells are positive. The staining intensity was scored as: 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong). Raw data were converted to IHS by multiplying the quantity score (0–4) by the staining intensity score (0-3), with a range from 0 to 12. An IHS of 9–12 was considered a strong (+3); 5–8, moderate (+2); 1–4, weak (+1); and 0, negative immunoreactivity.[11]
Figure 2: Immunohistochemical expression of prohibitin in: (a) benign prostatic hyperplasia showing negative maspin and prohibitin expression (Immunoperoxidase, ×200), (b) well-differentiated prostatic carcinoma showing weak (+1) maspin and prohibitin expression (Immunoperoxidase, ×400), (c) moderately differentiated prostatic carcinoma showing moderate (+2) maspin and prohibitin expression (Immunoperoxidase, ×400), and (d) poorly differentiated prostatic carcinoma showing strong (+3) maspin and prohibitin expression (Immunoperoxidase, ×400)

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the MedCalc ® Version 15.6.1 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). The Chi-square test was used for analysis of the differences in maspin and PHB immunohistochemical expression between the different grades of prostatic carcinoma. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Histopathological results

The studied prostatic carcinoma cases (30 cases) included 8 cases (26.7%) of well differentiated, 12 cases (40%) of moderately differentiated, and 10 cases (33.3%) of poorly differentiated carcinoma.

Immunohistochemical analysis of maspin expression

Positive maspin expression was detected in 3/15 (20%) cases of BPH, the positivity was seen only in the basal cells. In the studied prostatic carcinomas, 21/30 (70%) of cases showed positive maspin immunoreactivity. The highest maspin expression was observed in poorly differentiated carcinomas (10/10 [100%] of cases), followed by moderately differentiated carcinomas (8/12 [66.7%] of cases), and finally well-differentiated carcinomas (3/8 [37.5%] of cases), with a statistically significant difference between the different grades of the studied tumors (P = 0.0125). The immunohistochemical expression of maspin in the studied prostatic carcinoma cases is shown in [Table 1] and [Figure 1].
Table 1: Maspin expression in the studied prostatic carcinoma cases

Click here to view


Immunohistochemical analysis of prohibitin expression

PHB expression was detected in 21/30 (70%) of the studied prostatic carcinomas, while all the studies cases of BPH showed negative expression.

Within the studied carcinomas, the highest PHB expression was detected in poorly differentiated carcinomas (9/10 [90%] of cases), followed by moderately differentiated carcinomas (8/12 [66.7%] of cases), and finally well-differentiated carcinomas (4/8 [50%] of cases). PHB expression showed highly significant increase with increasing Gleason score (P = 0.0065). The immunohistochemical expression of PHB in the studied cases is shown in [Table 2] and [Figure 2].
Table 2: Prohibitin expression in the studied prostatic carcinoma cases

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Prostatic carcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in males and the second leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality.[12] Although the precise underlying mechanisms of prostatic carcinogenesis have not been fully understood yet, it is supposed that prostatic carcinoma results from a combination of genetic and environmental factors.[13],[14]

One of the mechanisms associated with prostatic carcinogenesis is mutation of Ras gene and activation of Bcl2. On the other hand, loss of function of tumor suppressor genes also contributes to tumor progression.[15]

As reported in different organ cancers, maspin and PHB have been suggested to play crucial roles in prostatic carcinogenesis. Maspin is a member of the serine protease inhibitor/noninhibitor superfamily,[6] which was originally discovered in normal mammary epithelium.[15] It was implicated in important processes related to carcinogenesis as suppression of tumor growth and metastasis through inhibition of basement membrane invasion,[16] enhancement of cell adhesion, and blocking cell migration.[17] It also has a pro-apoptotic effect through upregulation of bax, especially in human breast and prostatic cancer cells.[18] Moreover, maspin was claimed to have a potent inhibitory effect on osteolysis occurring in prostate cancer bone metastases.[19],[20] Another important function of maspin is inhibition of angiogenesis [21] throguh blocking fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated endothelial cell migration. It was also found to inhibit neovascularization in the rat cornea, moreover, maspin-treated prostatic tumor cells showed reduced vascularization in a xenograft mouse model.[5]

In the current work, maspin showed overexpression by the tumor cells of prostatic carcinoma (70%) of cases, while BPH showed expression only in 20% of cases, was restricted positivity to the basal cells. These results were in accordance with Zou et al.,[5] but contradictory to those reported by Fawzy et al.,[17] who found maspin expression in 93.3% of PBH and 36.6% of prostatic carcinomas. In BPH, they described intense maspin positivity in basal cells with weaker expression in luminal cells. Other studies also reported down-regulation of maspin expression in prostatic carcinomas.[15],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26] These conflicting differences may be attributed to the different genetic background of each tumor, the difference in antibodies, immunohistochemical methods, criteria of positive staining, and the methods of statistical analysis used.

The studies that reported downregulation of maspin expression in prostatic carcinomas suggested that the promoter of the maspin gene (CpG) is found in two states, methylation/demethylation. The former is usually associated with overexpression, while the latter is associated with downregulation of maspin. In nontransformed cells, this promoter is usually methylated, while in tumor cells it is hypomethylated. This hypomethylation is suggested to be involved in the cancer development and progression through activation of genes important for carcinogenesis.[27]

The present study revealed a significant increase in maspin expression with increasing Gleason score in the studied prostatic carcinomas (P = 0.0125). This was in accordance with Zou et al.,[5] while contradictory to Fawzy et al.[17] and Machtens et al.,[28] who observed an inverse correlation between maspin expression and the histological grade of their studied prostatic carcinomas.

Actually, as an inhibitor of tumor cell invasion and metastasis, maspin overexpression was expected in better-differentiated tumors; however, the significant positive relationship between maspin expression and Gleason score observed in this study as well as other studies [5] may be explained by the fact that tumor progression is a complex process involving changes in multiple molecular pathways that interact with each other and is not dependent only on the pathways involving maspin. Another explanation is that the immunohistochemical detection of maspin expression may not predict functional states of maspin, in other words, the presence of maspin protein in tumor cells may represent dysfunctional protein as occurs in the well-known “p53 scenario.” Maspin overexpression detected in poorly differentiated carcinomas may also reflect additional changes acquired by a subset of prostatic tumors that bypass the normal regulation of maspin expression.[5]

The increased maspin expression in high-grade carcinomas may suggest the association between maspin overexpression and poor prognosis in prostatic carcinoma patients. This finding is supported by the other studies that reported the association between maspin overexpression and increased aggressiveness of carcinomas in other organs.[29],[30],[31]

Importantly, maspin expression may be a good biomarker for screening of the response of prostatic cancer cells to the androgen ablation therapy. This was reported by Zou et al.[5] who observed upregulation of maspin expression in tumor cells showing histological response to hormonal treatment with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before surgery in prostatic carcinoma patients. This observation suggests that the androgen withdrawal may unmask maspin expression in prostatic cancer cells which frequently lack its expression.

PHB is another protein that has been observed to show altered expression in prostatic carcinoma. It has been implicated in important cellular processes and found in different cellular compartments including mitochondria, nucleus, and cell membrane. Subsequently, it has different functions according to the subcellular localization.[32]

Several reports indicated that PHB was generally overexpressed in transformed cells compared to their nontransformed counterparts,[33] and this forced investigators to find out its role in carcinogenesis. It was considered a tumor suppressor gene based on the findings of different studies. Fusaro et al.[34] and Wang et al.[35] discovered that PHB co-localizes with two important tumor suppressor genes, namely, p53 and Rb. Moreover, it was also discovered to co-localize with the transcription factor E2F, leading to inhibition of its transcriptional activity.[33] In addition, microinjection of PHB mRNA blocked cell proliferation.[36]

In addition to its antiproliferative effect, PHB was suggested to have an anti-apoptotic function, as its gene was observed to be downregulated in osteosarcoma cells in response to cytotoxic drugs, while transient overexpression of the PHB coding sequence significantly reduced cytotoxic drug-induced apoptosis in these cells.[37]

It was suggested that PHB may play a role in the cellular growth response to androgen stimulation in prostatic cancer cells.[38] It was found to be downregulated in androgen-stimulated proliferating prostatic cancer cells. Cell-cycle analysis of prostatic cancer cells showing reduced levels of PHB revealed high percentage of cycling cells, whereas cells with increased PHB levels showed lower percentage entering the cell cycle, suggesting that the regulation of PHB is a crucial part of the cellular growth response to androgens.[39]

In the current work, high PHB expression was observed in prostatic carcinoma cases (70% of cases), while all BPH cases showed negative expression. This was in agreement with Ummanni et al.,[40] who reported that PHB was highly expressed in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostatic carcinoma, but not in benign prostatic epithelium or proliferative inflammatory atrophy, suggesting that PHB expression may occur early in the development of cancer, and its expression may be useful to distinguish between prostatic carcinoma and BPH.

The present study further revealed a highly significant positive association between PHB expression and Gleason score (P = 0.0065), as it showed higher expression with increasing Gleason score. Such relation was not investigated, to the best of our knowledge, by previous studies, and it suggests that PHB overexpression may be associated with poor prognosis in prostatic carcinoma. This finding was supported by other studies that showed association between upregulation of PHB expression and poor prognosis in other cancers as bladder carcinoma.[41]

As discussed in association with maspin, the tumor suppressor actions of PHB entails its downregulation in cancers rather than overexpression. However, the current study, as well as other studies,[8] reported its upregulation in different organ cancers. Different explanations were suggested for PHB overexpression in proliferating cells, one of them is the presence of regulatory elements in the PHB promoter that bind to the Myc oncoprotein,[42] which is commonly upregulated in proliferating cells, and its upregulation induces the expression of PHB.[43] Other explanations include the mutation of PHB gene,[44] its upregulation as a result of metabolic stress after heat shock or oxidative stress, or as one of the attempts of the cell to suppress the high proliferation rate.[8]


  Conclusions Top


Overexpression of maspin and PHB in prostatic carcinoma reflects their vital roles in prostatic carcinogenesis. Their upregulation with increasing Gleason score indicates their prognostic significance. Moreover, PHB may differentiate between prostatic carcinoma and BPH being expressed only by malignant cells.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Saad F, Miller K. Current and emerging immunotherapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Urology 2015;85:976-86.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Vale CL, Burdett S, Rydzewska LH, Albiges L, Clarke NW, Fisher D, et al. Addition of docetaxel or bisphosphonates to standard of care in men with localised or metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analyses of aggregate data. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:243-56.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shtivelman E, Beer TM, Evans CP. Molecular pathways and targets in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2014;5:7217-59.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Baetke SC, Adriaens ME, Seigneuric R, Evelo CT, Eijssen LM. Molecular pathways involved in prostate carcinogenesis: Insights from public microarray datasets. PLoS One 2012;7:e49831.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zou Z, Zhang W, Young D, Gleave MG, Rennie P, Connell T, et al. Maspin expression profile in human prostate cancer (CaP) and in vitro induction of maspin expression by androgen ablation. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:1172-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Berardi R, Morgese F, Onofri A, Mazzanti P, Pistelli M, Ballatore Z, et al. Role of maspin in cancer. Clin Transl Med 2013;2:8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sharma A, Qadri A. Vi polysaccharide of Salmonella typhi targets the prohibitin family of molecules in intestinal epithelial cells and suppresses early inflammatory responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:17492-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Najm MZ, Zaidi S, Siddiqui WA, Husain SA. Immunohistochemical expression and mutation study of prohibitin gene in Indian female breast cancer cases. Med Oncol 2013;30:614.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gleason DF. The Veteran's Administration Cooperative Urologic Research Group: Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M, editor. Urologic Pathology: The Prostate. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1977. p. 171-98.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Li J, Djenaba JA, Soman A, Rim SH, Master VA. Recent trends in prostate cancer incidence by age, cancer stage, and grade, the United States, 2001-2007. Prostate Cancer 2012;2012:691380.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gou HF, Chen XC, Zhu J, Jiang M, Yang Y, Cao D, et al. Expressions of COX-2 and VEGF-C in gastric cancer: Correlations with lymphangiogenesis and prognostic implications. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2011;30:14.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kumar B, Lupold SE. MicroRNA expression and function in prostate cancer: A review of current knowledge and opportunities for discovery. Asian J Androl 2016;18:559-67.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Nelson WG, De Marzo AM, Isaacs WB. Mechanisms of disease: Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:36-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Flavin R, Zadra G, Loda M. Metabolic alterations and targeted therapies in prostate cancer. J Pathol 2011;223:283-94.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zhang M, Magit D, Sager R. Expression of maspin in prostate cells is regulated by a positive ets element and a negative hormonal responsive element site recognized by androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:5673-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Domann FE, Rice JC, Hendrix MJ, Futscher BW. Epigenetic silencing of maspin gene expression in human breast cancers. Int J Cancer 2000;85:805-10.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Fawzy AI, Gayyed MF, Elsaghir GA, Elbadry MS. Expression of snail transcription factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma in Egypt: Correlation with maspin protein expression and clinicopathologic variables. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013;6:1558-66.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Liu J, Yin S, Reddy N, Spencer C, Sheng S. Bax mediates the apoptosis-sensitizing effect of maspin. Cancer Res 2004;64:1703-11.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jiang N, Meng Y, Zhang S, Mensah-Osman E, Sheng S. Maspin sensitizes breast carcinoma cells to induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2002;21:4089-98.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Cher ML, Biliran HR Jr., Bhagat S, Meng Y, Che M, Lockett J, et al. Maspin expression inhibits osteolysis, tumor growth, and angiogenesis in a model of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:7847-52.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Zhang M, Volpert O, Shi YH, Bouck N. Maspin is an angiogenesis inhibitor. Nat Med 2000;6:196-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Pierson CR, McGowen R, Grignon D, Sakr W, Dey J, Sheng S, et al. Maspin is up-regulated in premalignant prostate epithelia. Prostate 2002;53:255-62.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Blacque OE, Worrall DM. Evidence for a direct interaction between the tumour suppressor serpin, maspin, and types I and III collagen. Biol Chem 2002;277:10783-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Bernardo MM, Meng Y, Lockett J, Dyson G, Dombkowski A, Kaplun A, et al. Maspin reprograms the gene expression profile of prostate carcinoma cells for differentiation. Genes Cancer 2011;2:1009-22.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Neal CL, Henderson V, Smith BN, McKeithen D, Graham T, Vo BT, et al. Snail transcription factor negatively regulates maspin tumor suppressor in human prostate cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2012;12:336.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Tahmatzopoulos A, Sheng S, Kyprianou N. Maspin sensitizes prostate cancer cells to doxazosin-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2005;24:5375-83.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Bettstetter M, Woenckhaus M, Wild PJ, Rümmele P, Blaszyk H, Hartmann A, et al. Elevated nuclear maspin expression is associated with microsatellite instability and high tumour grade in colorectal cancer. J Pathol 2005;205:606-14.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Machtens S, Serth J, Bokemeyer C, Bathke W, Minssen A, Kollmannsberger C, et al. Expression of the p53 and maspin protein in primary prostate cancer: Correlation with clinical features. Int J Cancer 2001;95:337-42.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Yu M, Zheng H, Tsuneyama K, Takahashi H, Nomoto K, Xu H, et al. Paradoxical expression of maspin in gastric carcinomas: Correlation with carcinogenesis and progression. Hum Pathol 2007;38:1248-55.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Sood AK, Fletcher MS, Gruman LM, Coffin JE, Jabbari S, Khalkhali-Ellis Z, et al. The paradoxical expression of maspin in ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:2924-32.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Ito Y, Yoshida H, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, et al. Maspin expression is directly associated with biological aggressiveness of thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2004;14:13-8.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Peng YT, Chen P, Ouyang RY, Song L. Multifaceted role of prohibitin in cell survival and apoptosis. Apoptosis 2015;20:1135-49.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Mishra S, Murphy LC, Nyomba BL, Murphy LJ. Prohibitin: A potential target for new therapeutics. Trends Mol Med 2005;11:192-7.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Fusaro G, Dasgupta P, Rastogi S, Joshi B, Chellappan S. Prohibitin induces the transcriptional activity of p53 and is exported from the nucleus upon apoptotic signaling. J Biol Chem 2003;278:47853-61.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Wang S, Fusaro G, Padmanabhan J, Chellappan SP. Prohibitin co-localizes with Rb in the nucleus and recruits N-CoR and HDAC1 for transcriptional repression. Oncogene 2002;21:8388-96.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
McClung JK, Jupe ER, Liu XT, Dell'Orco RT. Prohibitin: Potential role in senescence, development, and tumor suppression. Exp Gerontol 1995;30:99-124.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Fellenberg J, Dechant MJ, Ewerbeck V, Mau H. Identification of drug-regulated genes in osteosarcoma cells. Int J Cancer 2003;105:636-43.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Thuaud F, Ribeiro N, Nebigil CG, Désaubry L. Prohibitin ligands in cell death and survival: Mode of action and therapeutic potential. Chem Biol 2013;20:316-31.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Gamble SC, Odontiadis M, Waxman J, Westbrook JA, Dunn MJ, Wait R, et al. Androgens target prohibitin to regulate proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 2004;23:2996-3004.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Ummanni R, Junker H, Zimmermann U, Venz S, Teller S, Giebel J, et al. Prohibitin identified by proteomic analysis of prostate biopsies distinguishes hyperplasia and cancer. Cancer Lett 2008;266:171-85.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Jiang L, Dong P, Zhang Z, Li C, Li Y, Liao Y, et al. Akt phosphorylates prohibitin 1 to mediate its mitochondrial localization and promote proliferation of bladder cancer cells. Cell Death Dis 2015;6:e1660.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Nijtmans LG, Artal SM, Grivell LA, Coates PJ. The mitochondrial PHB complex: Roles in mitochondrial respiratory complex assembly, ageing and degenerative disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002;59:143-55.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Coates PJ, Nenutil R, McGregor A, Picksley SM, Crouch DH, Hall PA, et al. Mammalian prohibitin proteins respond to mitochondrial stress and decrease during cellular senescence. Exp Cell Res 2001;265:262-73.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Wang S, Faller DV. Roles of prohibitin in growth control and tumor suppression in human cancers. Transl Oncogenomics 2008;3:23-37.  Back to cited text no. 44
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed368    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded77    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal