|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 72-77
The awareness of pregnant patient about effect of antibiotics in pregnancy
Rehab Alsaleh, Shahad Gari, Maram Gari
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Web Publication||13-Jun-2019|
Dr. Rehab Alsaleh
Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Medication during pregnancy should be prescribed under caution as some medication has adverse effects on fetus health and they may be teratogenic. Antibiotics are widely used in pregnancy as a result of infections, adding that many pregnant women may administrate antibiotic without doctors' prescription. It is very important to assess the awareness of females about the effect of antibiotics during the pregnancy period. Aim: The aim of the study is to assess the awareness of pregnant patient about effect of antibiotics in pregnancy. Subjects and Methods: This study is cross-sectional study which was conducted in 2017 from September to October. Data were collected using interviewing questionnaire which investigated several variables including sociodemographics, clinical examination, clinical history, and clinical measurements. Results: Education and economic levels significantly affected the knowledge about reason for using antibiotic (P = 0.006, 0.002), using of antibiotic against what (P = 0.005, 0.000), education level affected the knowledge about the using of antibiotic without doctors' prescription (P = 0.01), and while economic level influenced knowledge about the effect of antibiotic (P = 0.01). Conclusion: There was good level of knowledge about using of antibiotic during pregnancy among females which was affected by economic and education levels.
Keywords: Antibiotic use, knowledge about antibiotics, pregnant women, Saudi Arabia
|How to cite this article:|
Alsaleh R, Gari S, Gari M. The awareness of pregnant patient about effect of antibiotics in pregnancy. J Microsc Ultrastruct 2019;7:72-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Alsaleh R, Gari S, Gari M. The awareness of pregnant patient about effect of antibiotics in pregnancy. J Microsc Ultrastruct [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 May 31];7:72-7. Available from: http://www.jmau.org/text.asp?2019/7/2/72/260236
| Introduction|| |
There is no effective medicine with no adverse effects; in case of pregnancy, there must be special concern as all medications should be avoided whenever possible during the first trimester and medicines should be prescribed only when it is necessary and they are expected to provide greater benefits to mother than the fetus' risk., The number of pregnant women who used medication has been increased more than twofold in the last 30 years. Antibiotics are commonly used during pregnancy in various cultural and health-care settings. Infection during pregnancy needs treatment; however, it is a challenge to prescribe antibiotics during pregnancy as the fetus needs protection from possible side effects that may result from using of antibiotics. It was reported by a large randomized controlled trial that there was an increased risk of cerebral palsy in preterm babies who were born to women treated with antibiotics. Other studies showed that the prevalence of resistant organisms in the maternal gut flora increased and the Gram-negative bacteremia-onset rate was increased in newborns with low birth weight and these were associated with prenatal antibiotics.,,, In several countries, there are no efforts to make sure that pregnant women had enough awareness., It was reported in previous studies that there was poor in knowledge among pregnant women for certain health risks in pregnancy.,,, One study showed that women were unsure and more restrictive about medicinal uses during pregnancy. A survey from Ethiopia revealed that more than half of pregnant women used over-the-counter medications during pregnancy and the majority of them used antibiotics and analgesics. No previous study had assessed the knowledge of pregnant women about the effect of antibiotic in pregnancy, so this was our aim in this study.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
Data collection and study design
This is a cross-sectional study conducted on 253 patients who were seen in 2017 from September to October. The sample design was nonprobability convenient sampling; data were collected on the visit of the patient to the outpatient clinic using interviewing questionnaire which investigated several variables including sociodemographics such as age, gender, area of residence, and hospital visits, clinical examination, clinical history, clinical measurements including vital signs (blood pressure [BP] and temperature), anthropometric measurement (height and weight), investigations (routine or specific), managements (therapeutics, symptomatic, counseling, and referral), and outcome of the disease.
Data were analyzed using SPSS software for PC (IBM version 22, USA), data were analyzed using subroutine descriptive frequency tables, bar charts, pie charts, P value, Chi-square, and standard deviation for continuous variables; of this study, the level of significance was 0.05 (5%).
| Results|| |
In the present study, there were 6.7% of females in the age range of 15–20 years, 54.9%, 30.6%, and 7.8% in the age range of 20–30, 30–40, and 40–50 years, respectively. The large majorities, i.e., 84.6%, were Saudi and 15.4% only were non-Saudi. There were 4.1% of females uneducated, 7.5% had less than high school education, 31% had high school education, and 57.5% had bachelor degree. Most of them, i.e. 76.1%, had moderate economic level, while 17.5% and 5.2% had high and low economic levels, respectively, and 1.1% could not classify their economic level. 39.2% of women had two and more children, 35.4% reported that it was the first time to have children, and 25.4% had only one child. On visit, 20.9% were in the first trimester, 41.4% were in the second trimester, and 37.7% were in the third trimester. Most of participants, i.e. 60.4%, were following up at one medical center, 35.1% in two medical centers, and 4.5% in three medical centers. Few percent, i.e. 2.6%, suffered abortion for more than two times, 7.5% suffered it twice, and 27.2% had abortion one time, whereas 62.7% did not suffer abortion before. The large majority, i.e., 85.8%, of participants had no health problem, while 4.1%, 6%, and 4.1% were suffering BP, diabetes, and urinary tract infection, respectively. The answers of females about maternal and neonate characteristics as well as females' knowledge on antibiotics are shown in [Table 1]. The most commonly used treatment agent was insulin 32%, few percent of females, i.e., 17.5%, used antibiotic during pregnancy, the most common reason for usage was urinary tract infection in 39.1% of females, and it was used more in the second semester of pregnancy in 44.7% of females. There were 55.3% used antibiotic for 4–7 days and the large majority, i.e., 91.5%, were using it according to doctor's prescription and they prescribed it during the clinic visit for 87.2%. Only 14.9% knew the antibiotic brands; Amoxi, Augmentin, and Colfax, were the most known brands; each was reported by 25% of participants. Few percent of females, i.e., 14.9%, reported using antibiotics in their previous pregnancies, 57.1% reported using antibiotics for ≤3 days, and the most common reason was high temperature reported in 41%. 51.1% said that pregnant women cannot use antibiotic, the most reported side effect of using antibiotic during pregnancy was fetal abnormalities 59.7%, followed by diarrhea 41.8%, and then killing useful bacteria and refusing treatment 33.6% and 20.9%, respectively. The large majority of women, i.e. 88.9%, reported no health problems suffered by their babies, while 11.1% reported that their babies had health problems. 78% of the women reported that there were useful bacteria in the body, while 64.9% reported having harmful bacteria in the body. Most of the participants 52.2% stated that antibiotic was used for bacterial infection, 60.8% stated that antibiotic affected both breastfeeding and pregnant women, and the large majority of females 85.4% knew that it was wrong behavior to use antibiotic without doctors' prescription.
By investigating factors that may influence the knowledge of females, it was found that education level was significantly affected the knowledge about reason for using antibiotic (P = 0.006), using antibiotic for (P = 0.005), and using antibiotic without doctors' prescription (P = 0.01) [Table 2]. Further, economic level significantly affected the knowledge about reason for using antibiotic (P = 0.002), using antibiotic for (P = 0.000), and the effect of antibiotic (P = 0.01) [Table 3]. Different variables were assessed whether they influence each other; age and previous abortion did not affect the duration of using antibiotic (P = 0.1 and 0.2, respectively); also, reasons of using antibiotic were not affected by the knowledge of brands (P = 0.5). Using antibiotic in the previous pregnancy was significantly associated with the method by which doctor prescribed the antibiotic (P = 0.03), and also, using of antibiotic during pregnancy was associated with the pregnancy stages (P = 0.003).
|Table 2: Correlation between education level and knowledge about antibiotics|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Correlation between economic level and knowledge about antibiotics|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In the present study, we investigated the awareness of pregnant women about the effect of antibiotics in pregnancy. Knowledge of patient is important to develop his/her beliefs., A study from Sudan demonstrated that 15.2% never use medication during pregnancy. In Saudi study, it was found that antibiotics represented 2.6% among other types of medications to be used among pregnant women. A study from the UK showed that one-third of the pregnant females received at least one antibiotic during their pregnancies and 14% of them received at least one antibiotic in each trimester; the study also reported that some antibiotics were prescribed more frequently as a result of urinary tract infection. A study was conducted on pregnant women in rural Ghana revealed that 65% of pregnant women administrated antibiotics at some stage of pregnancy. The large majority of pregnant women in this study did not use antibiotic during the current pregnancy (82.5%), and most of those who used it were during second trimester (44.7%) and duration ranged from 4 to 7 days (55.3%); the main reason for using antibiotic was infection either urinary tract infection (39.1%) or vaginal infection (26.1%). 91.5% of females used antibiotics according to the prescription of doctors and through clinic visit (87.2%). In addition, higher percent (85.1%) of females did not use antibiotics in their previous pregnancies, most of those who used it reported using it during ≤ 3 days, and the most common reason for using it was high temperature (41%). In the current study, the large majority of women reported that their babies had no health problem (88.9%). 51.1% of participants thought that pregnant women should not use antibiotic, where 59.7% of them stated that the side effect of using antibiotic was fetal abnormalities, and 60.8% mentioned that antibiotic affects both pregnant women and breastfeeding. The large majority of females knew that antibiotics are used for infections, and it was wrong behavior to administrate antibiotic without prescription from the doctors. In one study, it was found that 12.2% of women thought that all medications could be harmful to fetus. A previous study demonstrated that 91% of pregnant women had no awareness about the effect of medication in the heath of the fetus. Several trials were made to identify the pregnant women sociodemographic characteristics that are correlated with attitudes and beliefs regarding medications.,,, Socioeconomic level and education were reported. The present study revealed that education and economic levels significantly affected the knowledge about antibiotics. Those with bachelor degree and moderate economic level were had more awareness than other participants. Further, using of antibiotics was associated with being in the last stage of pregnancy which reflects the awareness of females toward the side effects of antibiotic in the first stages of pregnancy.
| Conclusion|| |
There was a good awareness of pregnant women about using antibiotic and its side effects during pregnancy. This awareness was represented in using antibiotic by prescription of doctors in the clinic and their knowledge that using it by themselves was a wrong behavior, not using it in the first stages of pregnancy, and their knowledge about the uses of antibiotics; also, most of participants did not administrate antibiotics during their previous or current pregnancy. This was the first study to assess the knowledge of pregnant women about antibiotics and it showed good knowledge; however, further studies are recommended to include other areas of the country.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Bishop M, Peugh J, Murukutla N, et al.
Toward higher-performance health systems: Adults' health care experiences in seven countries, 2007. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w717-34.
Sachdeva P, Patel BG, Patel BK. Drug use in pregnancy; a point to ponder! Indian J Pharm Sci 2009;71:1-7.
Porter, RS, editor. The Merck Manual's Online, Medical Library. Whitehouse Station: Merck Research Lab; 2004.
Medication during pregnancy: An intercontinental cooperative study. Collaborative group on drug use in pregnancy (C.G.D.U.P.). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992;39:185-96.
Mitchell AA, Gilboa SM, Werler MM, Kelley KE, Louik C, Hernández-Díaz S, et al.
Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:51.e1-8.
Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, Brocklehurst P, Marlow N, Salt A, et al.
Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet 2008;372:1319-27.
Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al.
Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002;347:240-7.
Bizzarro MJ, Dembry LM, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Changing patterns in neonatal Escherichia coli
sepsis and ampicillin resistance in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Pediatrics 2008;121:689-96.
Conroy ME, Shi HN, Walker WA. The long-term health effects of neonatal microbial flora. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;9:197-201.
Jones B, Peake K, Morris AJ, McCowan LM, Battin MR. Escherichia coli
: A growing problem in early onset neonatal sepsis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:558-61.
Eiser C, Eiser JR. Health education needs of primigravidae. Child Care Health Dev 1985;11:53-60.
Marsack CR, Alsop CL, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C. Pre-pregnancy counselling for the primary prevention of birth defects: rubella vaccination and folate intake. Med J Aust 1999;170:143-4.
Roth LK, Taylor HS. Risks of smoking to reproductive health: Assessment of women's knowledge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:934-9.
Arnold CL, Davis TC, Berkel HJ, Jackson RH, Nandy I, London S. Smoking status, reading level, and knowledge of tobacco effects among low-income pregnant women. Am J Prev Med 2001;32:313-20.
Nordeng H, Koren G, Einarson A. Pregnant women's beliefs about medications – A study among 866 Norwegian women. Ann Pharmacother 2010;44:1478-84.
Mohammed MA, Ahmed JH, Bushra AW, Aljadhey HS. J Appl Pharm Sci 2013:3:116-23.
DiMatteo MR, Haskard KB, Williams SL. Health beliefs, disease severity, and patient adherence: A meta-analysis. Med Care 2007;45:521-8.
Veazie PJ, Cai S. A connection between medication adherence, patient sense of uniqueness, and the personalization of information. Med Hypotheses 2007;68:335-42.
Eldalo AS, Siraj N, Yousif MA. Pregnant women's awareness and perception about medicines. Lat Am J Pharm 2015:34:869-74.
Zaki NM, Albarraq AA. Use, attitudes and knowledge of medications among pregnant women: A Saudi study. Saudi Pharm J 2014;22:419-28.
Petersen I, Gilbert R, Evans S, Ridolfi A, Nazareth I. Oral antibiotic prescribing during pregnancy in primary care: UK population-based study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:2238-46.
Mensah KB, Opoku-Agyeman K, Ansah C. Antibiotic use during pregnancy: A retrospective study of prescription patterns and birth outcomes at an antenatal clinic in rural Ghana. J Pharm Policy Pract 2017;10:24.
Banzal N, Saxena K, Dala M, Srivastava SK. A study to assess awareness amongst pregnant women about the effects of drugs on the fetus and self-medication. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 2017;6:924-7.
Nordeng H, Ystrøm E, Einarson A. Perception of risk regarding the use of medications and other exposures during pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010;66:207-14.
Rizk MA, Abdel-Aziz F, Ashmawy AA, Mahmoud AA, Abuzeid TM. Knowledge and practices of pregnant women in relation to the intake of drugs during pregnancy. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 1993;68:567-91.
Skouteris H, Wertheim EH, Rallis S, Paxton SJ, Kelly L, Milgrom J, et al.
Use of complementary and alternative medicines by a sample of Australian women during pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;48:384-90.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]